3.3 Establish attributes and metadata

Establishing the important metadata to be added to data inventories

Why should I do this?

To help users searching for this data to find it and, by using controlled vocabularies for attributes, improving future search and data linking potential—e.g., finding related data.

 

Using well-chosen metadata attributes improves data discoverability and interoperability, enabling others to locate and integrate data more easily. Applying a controlled vocabulary—a predefined set of terms for each attribute—enhances consistency, making searches more reliable and allowing data from different sources to be more easily linked. Classification, which involves grouping data by relevance or value, further refines data management by highlighting assets that are critical to strategic goals and operational success.

1) If you are a Program Officer (PO), you may want to share this page directly with your grantee, so they can act on it.

 

2) Use the workbook (and supporting factsheet) for Step 3 here. We recommend using the same document throughout this step, so you have a single document that captures all your workings.

 

3) Consider the below tips to help you decide on your attributes and metadata:

You may find there is benefit in classifying your data assets. Classification based on data assets’ direct impact on strategic goals, operational efficiency, and long-term sustainability, ensures that resources and attention are allocated effectively, focusing on data that drives the most value. This structured approach to prioritizing data assets allows your investment to focus on what is most critical to its immediate success and operational efficiency, while still maintaining an eye on long-term strategic goals and sustainability. If you think your investment will benefit from such classification, review the classification examples provided below, and start classifying your investment.

©Gates Archive/Mansi Midha ©Gates Archive/Mansi Midha

Every investment project is unique

The application of the six steps will vary accordingly. To provide examples that align with your project, common characteristics of AgDev investments were researched and three ‘investment types’ were developed.

©Gates Archive/Alissa Everett
  • The AgriConnect team established a standardized format for data collection, ensuring compatibility with FAIR principles.
  • Metadata attributes includes source, collection date, and relevance to specific farming practices. 
  • The digital solution was designed with an intuitive interface, offering multilingual support and visual data presentations to cater to farmers with varying literacy levels. 

 

©Gates Archive/Thomas Omondi
  • The AgroThrive team established standards for metadata and attributes of the data assets, ensuring that they aligned with FAIR principles. 
  • Prioritized metadata that supports the findability and accessibility of data, such as clear descriptions of the data source, collection methods, and usage rights. 
  • With a wealth of information, they developed standards that would make their findings easily discoverable and accessible, ensuring that every piece of data was meticulously cataloged and described. 

 

©Gates Archive/Esther Mbabazi
  • As the project unfolded, NGBT carefully documented each data point with detailed metadata attributes.
  • This meticulous documentation ensured that future researchers could understand the context, methods, and significance of the data, fostering an environment of transparency and reproducibility. 

 

The EU estimates the true opportunity cost of not having FAIR data in research to be at €10.2 Bn each year.

European Commission, ‘Cost-benefit analysis for FAIR research data—Cost of not having FAIR research data’ (2018)

Learn more
Was this page helpful?
YesNo